Common Mistakes Students Made in CUET 2025 and How to Avoid Them

Published by Shikha Kumari on Sep 25, 2025

In CUET UG 2025, students made common mistakes by misclicking “Answer and Review” on all 50 questions instead of “Save and Next,” turning screens purple and locking responses prematurely in both subjects during May 21 shift, while preparation pitfalls included skipping NCERT for 90% factual Domain questions and neglecting mocks for moderate RC timing in Language, leading to 20-30% lower attempts than the ideal 120-140 total.

In this guide, you’ll learn common mistakes from CUET 2025 application like wrong subject choices, preparation errors such as over-relying on cramming for General Test GK, exam-day pitfalls like late arrival causing missed instructions, section-wise issues in Language vocabulary twists, Domain numerical overthinking in Physics, and General Test pattern skipping, plus avoidance strategies like weekly timed mocks for 2026 to hit 180-220 scores in BA Economics or B.Sc Physics at DU or BHU.

CUET UG 2025 Pattern Context for Mistakes

CUET UG 2025 used CBT with Language (50 questions, attempt 40, 200 marks in 45 minutes), Domain (50 questions, attempt 40, 200 marks in 45 minutes per subject), and General Test (60 questions, attempt 50, 250 marks in 60 minutes) over 19 shifts from May 13 to June 3, no negative marking.

This structure amplified mistakes like time misallocation in moderate shifts, where 70% difficulty led to rushed Domain numericals, dropping attempts below 32-38. Understanding fixed timers and no penalties highlights the need for paced practice to avoid locking screens or incomplete sections, as seen in 43% students reporting errors in provisional keys for English and Accounts.

Application Process Errors in CUET 2025

• Students in CUET 2025 frequently submitted forms with wrong contact details, causing missed admit card emails, or selected incorrect subjects like choosing Physics without Class 12 background, leading to mismatched Domain papers on May 15.
• Incorrect exam center sequences placed candidates far from home, adding travel stress, while uploading unmatching photos (3.5×4.5 cm specs) resulted in 8% rejections per NTA data.
• To avoid for 2026, verify details twice before INR 1000 fee payment, match subjects to board syllabus, and sequence centers by proximity. This prevents 20% candidature issues, ensuring smooth May shifts.

Common Mistakes from 2025 Trends

• CUET 2025 preparation saw students over-relying on cramming for 60% factual Domain questions, ignoring mocks that simulated 45-minute timers, resulting in panic during May 20’s moderate RC with only 30 attempts instead of 35-40.
• Neglecting revision left 30% gaps in General Test GK on 2024 elections, while believing postponement rumors wasted March-April focus.
• For 2026, integrate weekly NCERT revisions with 4 mocks monthly, allocating 40% time to application items like Chemistry mechanisms. This counters 65% moderate trends, building 98 percentile readiness from October.

Exam-Day Common Pitfalls in CUET 2025

• On exam day, CUET 2025 students arrived late to centers, missing 5-minute instructions on “Save and Next” clicks, causing purple screen locks in 21% cases on May 21.
• Forgetting admit cards barred 5% entry, and not reading question previews led to misinterpreting MSQ partials in Domain.
• To sidestep for 2026, reach 30 minutes early with photo ID and printed admit, skim instructions first, and flag 5 tough questions per section for 5-minute review. This maximizes 120-140 attempts across shifts.

Language Section Mistakes and Fixes

• CUET 2025 Language errors involved spending 30 minutes on one RC passage, leaving 10 grammar questions unanswered in May 20 Shift 2, dropping attempts to 30 from 35-40.
• Overthinking synonyms like “ambiguous” caused 15% skips in verbal ability.
• Avoid by timing 2 minutes per RC question, listing 5 synonyms daily from past papers, and attempting all 40 in 45 minutes. This secures 200 marks, matching easy factual trends in 35% shifts

Domain Subject Errors in Physics and Chemistry

• In CUET 2025 Physics, students overthought 15 mechanics numericals, averaging 25 minutes instead of 20, yielding 28 attempts in May 22 Shift 1 versus 35-38 ideal.
• Chemistry errors included skipping 18 organic reactions due to unfamiliar SN1 mechanisms, limiting to 30 attempts in easy May 28 Shift 2.
• For 2026, solve 15 mechanics graphs in 20 minutes weekly, map 18 reactions daily, and flag 3 tough ones per 45-minute section. This exploits 90% NCERT factuals for 36-40 attempts.

History and Economics Domain Pitfalls

• CUET 2025 History mistakes featured rushing chronology, missing 12 modern events in moderate May 15 Shift 1, resulting in 25 attempts from 32-36 target.
• Economics students ignored 12 micro elasticity cases, spending 25 minutes on theory, dropping to 25 attempts in June 3 Shift 2.
• Counter for 2026 by quizzing 15 timelines in 20 minutes, analyzing 12 cases with graphs in 15 minutes, ensuring 30-34 attempts in 45-minute slots. This addresses 75% humanities application.
• Before General Test, 2025 Domain errors stemmed from 85% NCERT skips, emphasizing timed revision.

General Test Oversights and Solutions

• CUET 2025 General Test pitfalls included allocating 25 minutes to 15 GK affairs, leaving 10 logical syllogisms untouched in moderate May 19, reducing attempts to 35 from 40-45.
• Quantitative arithmetic errors from calculation skips cost 10 marks in basic profit-loss.
• For 2026, prioritize 20 minutes on GK by answering known first, 15 on quant with shortcuts, 15 on logic patterns, flagging 5 for review in 60 minutes. This captures 250 marks, countering 30% current affairs weightage.

Shift-wise Mistake Patterns from 2025

CUET 2025 shift patterns revealed May 13 easy factuals where overconfidence led to careless skips in Language (30 attempts), May 31 moderate Biology diagrams causing 25-minute overruns (28 attempts). June 3 easy theory saw rushed General GK, missing 8 items. For 2026, adapt by starting mocks with easy questions in first 10 minutes, adjusting for moderate variances with 5-minute buffers. This maintains 120-140 total attempts.

3-Month Plan to Dodge CUET Mistakes

• Launch CUET 2026 avoidance plan October 2025 with Month 1 on Language timing (40 RC in 40 minutes weekly), Month 2 Domain numerical pacing (35 in 40 minutes), Month 3 General GK prioritization (45 in 50 minutes) and full mocks.
• This addresses 2025’s 70% moderate errors, targeting 200+ scores.
• Week 1-4: Language 2-minute RC scans.
• Week 5-8: Domain 20-minute high-weight drills.
• Week 9-12: General 15-minute logic sets.
• Incorporate daily 5-question flags for reviews.

Daily Routine to Prevent Errors

Establish CUET 2026 daily routine with 45-minute Language (prioritize RC), 45 Domain (flag 3 tough), 60 General (known GK first) from October. This sidesteps overruns, yielding 98 percentile.

Weekly Mock Reviews

Review 2025 papers weekly in 3-hour mocks, logging time traps like 30-minute RC to adjust for 2026. This refines pacing.

Monthly Full Tests with Error Tracking

Conduct 4 monthly mocks from November, tracking attempts like 35 Language to exceed 2025’s 120-140. This builds resilience.

Conclusion

CUET UG 2025’s CBT pattern with Language (200 marks, 45 minutes, 35-40 attempts moderate RC), Domain (200 marks, 45 minutes, e.g., Physics numericals 35-38, Chemistry reactions 36-40, History chronology 32-36, Economics cases 30-34), and General Test (250 marks, 60 minutes, 40-45 moderate GK) over May 13-June 3 shifts showed 70% moderate difficulty, common errors like RC overruns and numerical skips dropping to 120 attempts for 180-220 scores. For 2026, weekly 40 RC, 35 numericals, 45 GK in 3-month plan starting October to exceed these, securing BA or B.Sc at DU—use tips for your advantage.